Friday, May 30, 2014

Ten essential reads to understand the World Cup protests


1. "No, I'm not going to the World Cup" by Carla Dauden (independent, 17 June 2013)
The first clear statement in English of anti-WC protests, by a Brazilian. An excellent, concise, and well-researched video.

2. "Brazil's bread and circuses" by Emma Elliott Freire (The Moral Liberal, 7 May 2014)
An overview of the major issues that are being talked about recently. I do not support the blog on which this is published.

3. "The Brazil behind the cup" by Mateo Pimentel (Dissident Voice, 30 May 2014)
He thinks that the World Cup will give protesters a global forum. I've heard that before. When the sporting starts, the talk stops (South Africa, Sochi, etc). Doesn't have to be like that, though.

4. "'There will have been no World Cup'" by Rodrigo Nunes (Al Jazeera, 30 May 2014)
A philosopher discusses why "World Cup protests" is a misnomer: long-standing social unrest is only recently focusing on the WC as the (rightful) epitome of its frustration.

5. "Generation June" by Wright Thompson (ESPN Magazine, 3 December 2013)
A splendidly written feature story focusing less on the politics and more on the young populists that are engaged in constant protests against Brazil's government, from Lula to Rousseff. My personal favorite among all of these articles.

6. "Brazil's World Cup is an expensive, exploitative nightmare" by Vic Verikaitis (Daily Beast, 30 May 2014)
Vanishing money, slave work, and an all-present bureaucracy. Again, sounds like Russia. Or Italy. Or Greece. Or any one of these soon-to-be Third World economies.

7. "Labor protests ramp up as World Cup nears" by Vincent Bevins (Los Angeles Times, 17 May 2014)
Same as above, with an emphasis on union protests.

8. "Brazil's World Cup party can't hide the country's tensions" by David Goldblatt (The Observer, 24 May 2014)
Focusing on the role of football in Brazil's broader sociopolitical context, especially as concerns race.

9. "Beyond samba, sex, and soccer" by Khaled A. Beydoun (Al Jazeera, 28 May 2014)
A critical race theorist casts Brazil's perennial social unrest in terms of racial warfare and only secondarily as a set of economic grievances.

10. Pictures of protests by indigenous people (The Huffington Post, 28 May 2014)
It is hard to find extensive critical commentaries on this side of the protests, so pictures it is. Really good pictures, too.
.
.

Sunday, May 18, 2014

Preliminary World Cup analysis, discussion, and predictions



group analysis
I have already written about this and not much has changed, so I will mostly repeat myself here.



The hosts have been relatively lucky, though there are no dead weights in this group. More importantly, Croatia, Mexico, and Cameroon are all at more or less the same level, and in few groups will the second spot be so hotly contested. Also, Brazil should beware of racking up three lopsided wins and become overconfident going into the R16, when the real World Cup begins.
Projection: BRAZIL and CROATIA


The first Group of Death, for Australia anyway: the Socceroos are practically out, while Spain, Netherlands, and Chile will fight for it. This group has both finalists from the latest edition: Netherlands and holders Spain. This also happened in 2010, when Italy and France were in the same group, and both went out in the group stage. I don’t see that happening to Spain, but the Oranje? Why not. In my view Chile have a leg up. This will be a lot of fun to watch.
Projection: SPAIN and CHILE



One of two easiest groups, though this one too will be interesting due to the four teams being roughly even. I give a slight edge to Colombia and Ivory Coast, but Japan’s fizz and Greece’s bus-parking abilities ought not to be underestimated.
Projection: COLOMBIA and IVORY COAST


The second Group of Death and the only one with three previous World Cup winners! So much football history. These three have met recently in major tourneys (Euro 2012 and Confeds 2013) too: Italy have always prevailed, but on penalties after very close matches. However, I trust Italy’s historic ability to play better against their equals than against their inferiors, and the very weak English roster should prove fatal to them.
ProjectionURUGUAY and ITALY



The easiest group by popular consensus, so the French have scored big. Of course, France are themselves very weak lately, and I think that no amount of last-minute good luck will change that. Still, given the field, they ought to pass. Also, I think that Switzerland will surprise. While they’re no Belgium, they are slowly rising as a new force of European football. Let me put it this way: for the first time, Switzerland at their best should prove equal or better than France at their best.
Projection: FRANCE and SWITZERLAND



Argentina got lucky, as they had been the last few times around too, and always cruised; as usual, their problems come later. Bosnia and Nigeria will contend the second spot, and frankly I think that much will depend on the Bosnians. They are a young team with extremely promising talents, and if they’re in the mood they can do great. As a Roma fan, in Pjanic I trust! Iran are glad to be here (and they should be proud: great new team, but far too inexperienced to succeed).
Projection: ARGENTINA and BOSNIA-HERZEGOVINA



The third Group of Death, and in my view this is the real killer. Unlike in B and D, here there are no cushion teams and all four have a genuine shot. Surely the USA look weakest on paper, but I would not discount Klinsmann and an overall experienced team. Conversely, Ghana do not look as good as they used to, but neither does Portugal I mean Ronaldo. With the exception of Germany, this one is up for grabs.
Projection, based on prudence: GERMANY and PORTUGAL



Belgium were lucky in the draw, and I am glad, because they deserve to be in the knockout rounds and we deserve to see them play at the highest level. I think they are not a fluke, and they remain my Euro 2016 favorites. Russia are the obvious candidate for the second spot, but watch out for the ever-resourceful Koreans, who while not as brilliant as one might have predicted 12 years ago, they are still dangerous.
Projection: BELGIUM and RUSSIA



odds analysis



(Data from Odds Checker). Bookies agree that Brazil are the clear favorite for the final victory at 3/1, closely followed by Argentina at around 4.5/1. A little too closely, perhaps, so there may be a little wishful thinking that we get to see a Brazil-Argentina final—I’ll admit I wish that too!. Germany and Spain sit together at around 6/1 or 7/1. These four are way ahead of the pack and might well reach the semis; all do in my bracket below. If so, it would be an epic Europe vs. Latin America showdown comprising the best of the last 12-16 years of world football.
The next four sit closely together: Belgium (18-20/1) slightly ahead of France (22/1), Uruguay (26/1), and Italy (26/1). I do not understand what bookies see in les bleus, an inexperienced and disjointed team. I basically agree with the other odds, though perhaps everyone is being a little generous with Belgium; more about this in the team analysis.
What lowers the odds so much for Italy and Uruguay is they cannot reach the semifinals without defeating either Brazil or Spain. As concerns the rosters, they are not five times lesser than those teams, but of course odds assess the likelihood of winning, not the worth of the team.
The next four to have a realistic chance are England, Portugal, Colombia, and the Netherlands, and I use “realistic” loosely. All the others will be lucky to make it out of the group stage. Honduras, Costa Rica, Iran, and Algeria trail far behind as the standard “cushion teams.”
It makes no sense to offer my own odds given the general agreement among the experts, of which I am not one. If I were to name the eight quarterfinalists, I too would pick those eight: Brazil, Argentina, Germany, Spain, Belgium, France, Uruguay, and Italy. I find this to be a far more sensible exercise than calling the Cup winner: at that stage, luck and circumstance begin to play a big role. It is also a big accomplishment to reach the quarters, and a lot of teams will call their World Cup campaign a success if they get that far.





top squads analysis

Some of these squads are definitive (23 players) while others are merely provisional (30 players, with 7 to be removed later after training camp: Ian Darke says "that should be illegal," and I agree).

Graphics taken from Eurosport, translated, and prettied-up.



I am shocked by the exclusion of Tevez, this year’s Serie A top scorer. Argentina could use the goals: Kun has been in regrettable form and Messi tends to choke in big events. I want the Argentines to do well because Messi needs World Cup success to cement his reputation as the third-greatest of all time. Ideal starting 11: Romero; Fernandez, Zabaleta, Campagnaro, Demichelis; Mascherano, Di Maria, Rodriguez; Aguero, Messi, Lavezzi.




A generation of young prodigies, but maybe too young, which is why many commentators eye Euro 2016 as their true goal. But much can change in two years, so they will want to strike while the iron is hot. Plus, there’s enough international experience among the veterans, especially in the back. Ideal starting 11: Mignolet; Vanden Borre, Kompany, van Buyten; Fellaini, Dembele, Witsel, Hazard; Lukaku, Mertens, Mirallas.





The usual refrain is that “Brazil can only lose.” That’s even truer this year. Their football is not what it used to be: I think it’s better. With only one star striker, a solid defense, and an intelligent midfield, this is the best Seleçao in years, and the home field advantage cannot hurt either. Ideal starting 11: Julio Cesar; Dani Alves, Thiago Silva, David Luiz, Dante; Ramires, Oscar, Gustavo, Hernanes; Neymar, Hulk.





England are like Argentina: big teams, small results. Except this is not a big team either, with an underwhelming roster and only one in-form striker (but very young). And given England’s group, I would not be surprised by a first-round exit. Would it have hurt to bring veterans like Cole and Terry to strengthen this loose bunch? Ideal starting 11: Hart; Cahill, Jagielka, Johnson; Barkley, Gerrard, Lampard, Milner, Sterling; Rooney, Sturridge.





Always a question mark. This year’s roster is even weaker than usual, though many of them are untested youths who could pull off a surprising performance. As it is, I predict (against some of the odds) that France will not advance past the round of 16, if they’re lucky to get that far. Ideal starting 11: Lloris; Debuchy, Koscielny, Evra; Cabaye, Pogba, Matuidi, Valbuena; Benzema, Ribery, Giroud.





Germany have not won a World Cup since 1990 and have failed to reach the final in all but one occasion since, despite always being the heavy favorites. While slightly less impressive than in past years, this is still a highly respectable roster that can beat anyone. No surprise exclusions. Ideal starting 11: Neuer; Boateng, Lahm, Mertesacker; Ozil, Khedira, Kroos, Schweinsteiger; Schurrle, Gotze, Reus.





While I generally agree with Prandelli’s philosophy of “out with the old,” I would have brought in-form veterans like Gilardino and Totti. The exclusion of Florenzi and Osvaldo is also hard to understand, especially with this paucity of strikers. With that said, Prandelli’s Italy rarely lose, and they have excelled at Euro 2012 and at the 2013 Confederations Cup, so some trust is warranted. Ideal starting 11: Buffon; Barzagli, Bonucci, Chiellini; Aquilani, De Rossi, Pirlo, Montolivo; Cassano, Balotelli, Rossi (or Destro, depending on form).





I have nothing to say about Portugal, except: Ideal starting 11: Ronaldo; Ronaldo, Ronaldo, Ronaldo, Ronaldo; Ronaldo, Ronaldo, Ronaldo, Ronaldo; Ronaldo, Ronaldo. Actual starting 11: Beto; Coentrao, Neto, Pepe; Veloso, Meireles, Carvalho, Moutinho; Ronaldo, Almeida, Postiga.





It is fashionable to say that Spain are “through” because other teams have figured them out. That’s an exaggeration. They are slightly more beatable, and they’re older, but this is still by far the best roster at this World Cup, and the machine is still well oiled. I agree with the odds that they are the most likely non-American team to win. Ideal starting 11: Casillas; Juanfran, Ramos, Pique; Alonso, Xavi, Iniesta, Fabregas, Silva; Costa, Villa.





One of my favorites to watch, Tabarez’s team embodies Argentina’s brilliance and Italy’s resourcefulness. There is no weak spot to this formation and the star strikers have enjoyed the best season of their careers. But a tough draw and either Spain or Brasil at the quarterfinals stage will make a final run very unlikely. Ideal starting 11: Muslera; Lugano, Godin, Maxi Pereira; Gargano, Gonzalez, Silva, Rodriguez; Cavani, Suarez, Forlan.




bracket

Just for fun. And yes, I will put money on this. ;-)